AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 930 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9613 vs 5460
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9613 vs 5460
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 vs 5460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 vs 5460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 151.0 GTexel / s vs 140.8 GTexel / s
- Around 7% better floating-point performance: 4,833 gflops vs 4,506 gflops
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3526 vs 2814
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3526 vs 2814
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s vs 140.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops vs 4,506 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3526 vs 2814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3526 vs 2814 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34778 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 | 5460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 | 3526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 | 5460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 | 3526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3350 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5203 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 575 | NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GM204 |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 490 | 491 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 930 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,506 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 140.8 GTexel / s | 151.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 160.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |