NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 6% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 875 MHz
Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 928 MHz
Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
716x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3342
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3342

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 August 2015 vs 7 November 2013
Core clock speed	930 MHz vs 875 MHz
Boost clock speed	1180 MHz vs 928 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 3 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3342

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 210 billion / sec vs 151.0 GTexel / s
Around 41% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 2048
Around 11% better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 4,833 gflops
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9517 vs 3884
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 635 vs 618
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 8909
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 8909
Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28211 vs 27798

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	210 billion / sec vs 151.0 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2880 vs 2048
Floating-point performance	5,345 gflops vs 4,833 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	9517 vs 3884
PassMark - G2D Mark	635 vs 618
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10021 vs 8909
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10021 vs 8909
Geekbench - OpenCL	28211 vs 27798

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3884

9517

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

618

635

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8909

10021

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8909

10021

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3709

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3709

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3342

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

27798

28211

Name	NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	3884	9517
PassMark - G2D Mark	618	635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8909	10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8909	10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3342
Geekbench - OpenCL	27798	28211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2001.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		182.11
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3338

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GM204	GK110B
Launch date	30 August 2015	7 November 2013
Place in performance rating	350	397
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$699
Price now		$749.99
Value for money (0-100)		14.80
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1180 MHz	928 MHz
Core clock speed	930 MHz	875 MHz
Floating-point performance	4,833 gflops	5,345 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2048	2880
Texture fill rate	151.0 GTexel / s	210 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	5,200 million	7,080 million
CUDA cores		2880
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB / s	336 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA