NVIDIA Titan X Pascal vs NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Titan X Pascal and NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 342.9 GTexel / s vs 151.0 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2048
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 10,974 gflops vs 4,833 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63437 vs 27798
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10841 vs 8909
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10841 vs 8909
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 August 2016 vs 30 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 342.9 GTexel / s vs 151.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops vs 4,833 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63437 vs 27798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10841 vs 8909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10841 vs 8909 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3333
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3333
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3333 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63437 | 27798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.354 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10841 | 8909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10841 | 8909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9559 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3884 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 618 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP102 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 2 August 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 346 | 350 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1417 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 342.9 GTexel / s | 151.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11,800 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 480.4 GB / s | 160.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Titan X Pascal with others
NVIDIATitan X Pascal vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1900
NVIDIATitan X Pascal vs
ATIRadeon HD 3850 X2
NVIDIATitan X Pascal vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800S
NVIDIATitan X Pascal vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
NVIDIATitan X Pascal vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
NVIDIATitan X Pascal vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580X
