NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 210 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 30.5 Watt vs 96 Watt
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 497 vs 127
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 497 vs 127
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 October 2009 vs 21 February 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt vs 96 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 497 vs 127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 497 vs 127 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 1402 MHz
- 5x more texture fill rate: 20.8 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 64 vs 16
- 5.3x better floating-point performance: 208 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 477 vs 126
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 44 vs 30
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3161 vs 688
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3161 vs 688
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 1402 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.8 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 64 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 208 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 vs 126 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 vs 30 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3161 vs 688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3161 vs 688 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 210
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 126 | 477 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 30 | 44 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 497 | 127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 497 | 127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 688 | 3161 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 688 | 3161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.465 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G94 |
Launch date | 12 October 2009 | 21 February 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | $179 |
Place in performance rating | 1674 | 1587 |
Price now | $32.99 | $39.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | 23.72 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1402 MHz | 1625 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | 64 |
Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | 208 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Pipelines | 16 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 4.16 GTexel / s | 20.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt | 96 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S / PDIF |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | 9" (22.9 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8.0 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
3D Vision | ||
SLI |