NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 210 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• 2.5x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 550 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 30.5 Watt vs 59 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

• 4.2x more texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 64 vs 16
• 4.5x better floating-point performance: 176 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 768 MB vs 512 MB
• 3.2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 402 vs 126
• Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 57 vs 30
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2917 vs 688
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2917 vs 688

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 210
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	126 402
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	30 57
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	688 2917
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	688 2917

Compare specifications (specs)