NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 589 MHz vs 540 MHz
- Around 76% higher texture fill rate: 7.6 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 48 vs 8
- 5.1x better floating-point performance: 105.6 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1062 vs 593
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1062 vs 593
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 10 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 589 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1062 vs 593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1062 vs 593 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 62 vs 50
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 185 vs 156
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 62 vs 50 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 185 vs 156 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 | 62 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 156 | 185 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1062 | 593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1062 | 593 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G98 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 10 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1629 | 1631 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 589 MHz | 540 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops | 20.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 7.6 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |