NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 589 MHz vs 460 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 68% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 42 Watt
- Around 98% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 56 vs 34
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 12 September 2007 |
Core clock speed | 589 MHz vs 460 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 42 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 56 vs 34 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 7.36 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 32 vs 16
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 58.88 gflops vs 44.86 gflops
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 190 vs 120
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1252 vs 1017
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1252 vs 1017
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 7.36 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 32 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 58.88 gflops vs 44.86 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 190 vs 120 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1252 vs 1017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1252 vs 1017 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 56 | 34 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 120 | 190 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2795 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1017 | 1252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1017 | 1252 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G84 |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 12 September 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1630 | 1633 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.77 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 589 MHz | 460 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 44.86 gflops | 58.88 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 4.71 GTexel / s | 7.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 42 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |