NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 450 MHz
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 319 vs 210
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 vs 59

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 320M

• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 25 Watt
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2474 vs 968
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1735 vs 1131
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1735 vs 1131

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 320M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	319 210
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	164 59
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	968 2474
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1131 1735
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1131 1735

Compare specifications (specs)