NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 450 MHz
• Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 4.184 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
• 2.9x better floating-point performance: 100.4 gflops vs 35.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 34 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
• Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 1794 MHz vs 1400 MHz
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 157
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 163 vs 70

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1230 vs 1131
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1230 vs 1131

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	320 157
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	163 70
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1131 1230
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1131 1230

Compare specifications (specs)