NVIDIA GeForce 615 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 615 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 660 MHz vs 550 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 507 vs 452
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 81

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

• 6.7x more texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 5.28 GTexel / s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
• 2.8x better floating-point performance: 352.0 gflops vs 126.7 gflops
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3315 vs 1708
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3315 vs 1708

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	507 452
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	292 81
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1708 3315
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1708 3315

Compare specifications (specs)