NVIDIA GeForce 710M vs AMD Radeon HD 8550G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 710M and AMD Radeon HD 8550G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 719 MHz vs 515 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 720 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 459 vs 412
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 125 vs 118
- Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2445 vs 1234
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1030 vs 753
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3075 vs 1397
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 2459
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1030 vs 753
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3075 vs 1397
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 2459
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 July 2013 vs 12 March 2013 |
Core clock speed | 719 MHz vs 515 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 459 vs 412 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 vs 118 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2445 vs 1234 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 vs 753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 2459 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 vs 753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 2459 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8550G
- 2.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 96
Pipelines | 256 vs 96 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8550G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 710M | AMD Radeon HD 8550G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 459 | 412 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 | 118 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2445 | 1234 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.51 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 148.156 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.577 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.718 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.855 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1030 | 753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3075 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 2459 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1030 | 753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3075 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 2459 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 710M | AMD Radeon HD 8550G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Terascale 3 |
Code name | GK208 | Richland |
Launch date | 24 July 2013 | 12 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1399 | 1400 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 720 MHz |
Core clock speed | 719 MHz | 515 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 256 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |