NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 6x more pipelines: 48 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 7.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 477 vs 65
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 34
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1601 vs 328
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1601 vs 328
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 3 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 738 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 vs 65 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 34 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 vs 328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 vs 328 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 | 65 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 34 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.13 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 | 328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 | 328 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | |
Code name | GF117 | MCP77MV MCP79MVL |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 3 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1511 | 1687 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |