NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810M and NVIDIA NVS 5400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce 810M

NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 12% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 660 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1076 vs 1069
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 1652
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3035 vs 2282
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1076 vs 1069
Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 1652
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3035 vs 2282

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	24 March 2014 vs 1 June 2012
Core clock speed	738 MHz vs 660 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1076 vs 1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1833 vs 1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3035 vs 2282
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1076 vs 1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1833 vs 1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3035 vs 2282

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Around 79% higher texture fill rate: 10.56 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
Around 79% better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 620 vs 418
2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 186 vs 66
Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2127 vs 1607
Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.068 vs 4.403
Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 vs 131.239

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	10.56 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
Pipelines	96 vs 48
Floating-point performance	253.4 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 45 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	620 vs 418
PassMark - G2D Mark	186 vs 66
Geekbench - OpenCL	2127 vs 1607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.068 vs 4.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	229.562 vs 131.239

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5400M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

418

620

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

186

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1607

2127

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.403

5.068

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

131.239

229.562

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1076

1069

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1833

1652

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3035

2282

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1076

1069

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1833

1652

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3035

2282

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 810M	NVIDIA NVS 5400M
PassMark - G3D Mark	418	620
PassMark - G2D Mark	66	186
Geekbench - OpenCL	1607	2127
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.403	5.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	131.239	229.562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1076	1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1833	1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3035	2282
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1076	1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1833	1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3035	2282
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		11.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		19.696

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 810M	NVIDIA NVS 5400M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi
Code name	GF117	GF108
Launch date	24 March 2014	1 June 2012
Place in performance rating	1437	1439
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	738 MHz	660 MHz
Floating-point performance	141.7 gflops	253.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	48	96
Texture fill rate	5.904 GTexel / s	10.56 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	585 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus