NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 10 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 96 vs 80
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 499 vs 165
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1195 vs 401
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1447 vs 746
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1763
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 vs 401
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1447 vs 746
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1763
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 March 2015 vs 5 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 499 vs 165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 vs 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1447 vs 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 1763 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 vs 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 vs 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 1763 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 112
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2802 vs 2736
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 vs 112 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2802 vs 2736 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 499 | 165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 112 | 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2736 | 2802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 | 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1447 | 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 1763 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 | 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 | 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 1763 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 820M | AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK107 | Cedar |
Launch date | 21 March 2015 | 5 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1468 | 1471 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |