NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs Intel HD Graphics 5300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and Intel HD Graphics 5300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • 8.1x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 100 MHz
  • 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 492 vs 403
  • Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2787 vs 1470
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1195 vs 709
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1447 vs 693
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1627
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 vs 709
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1447 vs 693
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1627
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 March 2015 vs 5 September 2014
Core clock speed 810 MHz vs 100 MHz
Pipelines 96 vs 24
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 492 vs 403
Geekbench - OpenCL 2787 vs 1470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1195 vs 709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1447 vs 693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 vs 1627
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1195 vs 709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1447 vs 693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 vs 1627

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5300

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 113
Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 180 vs 113

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5300

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
492
403
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
113
180
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2787
1470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1195
709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1447
693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
1627
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1195
709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1447
693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
1627
Name NVIDIA GeForce 820M Intel HD Graphics 5300
PassMark - G3D Mark 492 403
PassMark - G2D Mark 113 180
Geekbench - OpenCL 2787 1470
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 161.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.686
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 14.257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 22.768
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1195 709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1447 693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 1627
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1195 709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1447 693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 1627
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 847

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 820M Intel HD Graphics 5300

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Generation 8.0
Code name GK107 Broadwell GT2
Launch date 21 March 2015 5 September 2014
Place in performance rating 1461 1462
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 810 MHz 100 MHz
Floating-point performance 240.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 96 24
Texture fill rate 10 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 1,300 million
Boost clock speed 900 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x1

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1802 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0 1

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers
Quick Sync