NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs Intel HD Graphics 5300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and Intel HD Graphics 5300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 8.1x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 100 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 492 vs 403
- Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2787 vs 1470
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1195 vs 709
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1447 vs 693
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1627
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 vs 709
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1447 vs 693
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1627
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 March 2015 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 100 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 492 vs 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2787 vs 1470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 vs 709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1447 vs 693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 1627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 vs 709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 vs 693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 1627 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5300
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 113
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 vs 113 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | Intel HD Graphics 5300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 492 | 403 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 | 180 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2787 | 1470 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 | 709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1447 | 693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 1627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 | 709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 | 693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 1627 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 820M | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | GK107 | Broadwell GT2 |
Launch date | 21 March 2015 | 5 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1461 | 1462 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,300 million |
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
Quick Sync |