NVIDIA GeForce 830M vs ATI Radeon HD 5750
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 830M and ATI Radeon HD 5750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 700 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 86 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4160 vs 992
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.955 vs 7.384
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.013 vs 0.679
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.443 vs 53.346
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 vs 1757
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 vs 1757
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 13 October 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 86 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4160 vs 992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.955 vs 7.384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.013 vs 0.679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.443 vs 53.346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 vs 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 vs 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3347 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 720 vs 256
- Around 71% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1164 vs 1008
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 337 vs 136
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 460.31 vs 156.544
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.118 vs 17.81
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2124 vs 1729
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2124 vs 1729
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 720 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 588.8 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1164 vs 1008 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 vs 136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 vs 156.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 vs 17.81 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 vs 1729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 vs 1729 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 830M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 830M | ATI Radeon HD 5750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1008 | 1164 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 136 | 337 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4160 | 992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.955 | 7.384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 156.544 | 460.31 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.013 | 0.679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.81 | 23.118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.443 | 53.346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1729 | 2124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 | 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1729 | 2124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 | 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 830M | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM108 | Juniper |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 13 October 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1228 | 1231 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 700 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 720 |
Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 86 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 178 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity |