NVIDIA GeForce 830M vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 830M and ATI Radeon HD 5750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 700 MHz
• Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 700 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 86 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4179 vs 980
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.955 vs 7.384
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.013 vs 0.679
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.443 vs 53.346
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 vs 1757
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 vs 1757

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750

• Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
• 2.8x more pipelines: 720 vs 256
• Around 71% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
• 2.6x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 vs 1010
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 337 vs 136
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 460.31 vs 156.544
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.118 vs 17.81
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2124 vs 1729
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2124 vs 1729

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 830M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1010 1165
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	136 337
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4179 980
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.955 7.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	156.544 460.31
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.013 0.679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.81 23.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.443 53.346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1729 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3589 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1729 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3589 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3347

Compare specifications (specs)