NVIDIA GeForce 830M versus ATI Radeon HD 5750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 830M and ATI Radeon HD 5750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 830M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 55% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1082 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 64% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 86 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 4.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4160 versus 1012
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.955 versus 7.384
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.013 versus 0.679
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.443 versus 53.346
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 versus 1757
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 versus 1757
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 13 October 2009 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1082 MHz versus 700 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 700 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 86 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4160 versus 1012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.955 versus 7.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.013 versus 0.679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.443 versus 53.346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 versus 1757 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 versus 1757 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3347 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Environ 37% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 18.4 GTexel / s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 720 versus 256
- Environ 71% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,008.0 gflops versus 588.8 gflops
- 2.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4600 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1163 versus 1008
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 337 versus 136
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 460.31 versus 156.544
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.118 versus 17.81
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2124 versus 1729
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2124 versus 1729
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s versus 18.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 720 versus 256 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,008.0 gflops versus 588.8 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4600 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1163 versus 1008 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 versus 136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 versus 156.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 versus 17.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 versus 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 versus 1729 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 830M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 830M | ATI Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1008 | 1163 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 136 | 337 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4160 | 1012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.955 | 7.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 156.544 | 460.31 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.013 | 0.679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.81 | 23.118 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.443 | 53.346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1729 | 2124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 | 1757 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1729 | 2124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 | 1757 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 830M | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GM108 | Juniper |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 13 October 2009 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1228 | 1231 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1082 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 588.8 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 720 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.4 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 86 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 178 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 830M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5750
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
