NVIDIA GeForce 830M versus ATI Radeon HD 5750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 830M and ATI Radeon HD 5750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 830M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 55% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1082 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 64% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 86 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 4.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4179 versus 980
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.955 versus 7.384
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.013 versus 0.679
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.443 versus 53.346
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 versus 1757
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 versus 1757
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 13 October 2009 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1082 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 86 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4179 versus 980 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.955 versus 7.384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.013 versus 0.679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.443 versus 53.346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 versus 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 versus 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3347 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Environ 37% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 18.4 GTexel / s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 720 versus 256
- Environ 71% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,008.0 gflops versus 588.8 gflops
- 2.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4600 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 versus 1010
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 337 versus 136
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 460.31 versus 156.544
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.118 versus 17.81
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2124 versus 1729
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2124 versus 1729
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s versus 18.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 720 versus 256 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,008.0 gflops versus 588.8 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4600 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 versus 1010 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 versus 136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 versus 156.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 versus 17.81 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 versus 1729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 versus 1729 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 830M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 830M | ATI Radeon HD 5750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1010 | 1165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 136 | 337 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4179 | 980 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.955 | 7.384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 156.544 | 460.31 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.013 | 0.679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.81 | 23.118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.443 | 53.346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1729 | 2124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 | 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1729 | 2124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 | 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 830M | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GM108 | Juniper |
Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 13 October 2009 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1229 | 1232 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 700 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1082 MHz | 700 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 588.8 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 720 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.4 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 86 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 178 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity |