NVIDIA GeForce 830M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 830M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 256 vs 240
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 6.6x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 219 Watt
- 2.3x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 896 MB
- Around 59% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1134 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 136 vs 63
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3195
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3195
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 15 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 256 vs 240 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 219 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 896 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1134 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 136 vs 63 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3195 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 50.6 billion / sec vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- Around 14% better floating-point performance: 673.9 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1378 vs 1009
- 5.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23256 vs 4232
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 673.9 gflops vs 588.8 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1378 vs 1009 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23256 vs 4232 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 830M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 830M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1009 | 1378 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 136 | 63 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4232 | 23256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.955 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 156.544 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.013 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.81 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.443 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1729 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1729 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3195 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 830M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | GT200B |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 15 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1232 | 1235 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Price now | $119.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 673.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s | 50.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 219 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 896 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 127.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 448 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1134 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 830M with others
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 275
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370M
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
NVIDIAGeForce 830M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
