NVIDIA GeForce 840A vs AMD FirePro M5950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840A and AMD FirePro M5950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840A

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 725 MHz
  • Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 24% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5596 vs 1279
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2188 vs 1528
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2188 vs 1528
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 March 2014 vs 4 January 2011
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 725 MHz
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5596 vs 1279
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2188 vs 1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2188 vs 1528

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5950

  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
  • Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 2002 MHz
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1314 vs 1123
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 574 vs 221
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 2314
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 2314
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3117
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3117
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 480 vs 384
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz vs 2002 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1314 vs 1123
PassMark - G2D Mark 574 vs 221
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2590 vs 2314
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2590 vs 2314
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 vs 3117
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 vs 3117

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840A
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5950

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1123
1314
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
221
574
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5596
1279
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2188
1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2188
1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2314
2590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2314
2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3117
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3117
3354
Name NVIDIA GeForce 840A AMD FirePro M5950
PassMark - G3D Mark 1123 1314
PassMark - G2D Mark 221 574
Geekbench - OpenCL 5596 1279
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2188 1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2188 1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2314 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2314 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3117 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3117 3354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 323.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 16.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 66.638

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 840A AMD FirePro M5950

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell TeraScale 2
Code name GM108 Whistler
Launch date 17 March 2014 4 January 2011
Place in performance rating 991 993
Type Desktop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1029 MHz 725 MHz
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 696.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 480
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s 17.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 716 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 MXM-A (3.0)
Bus support n / a
Form factor MXM-A
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 16.02 GB / s 57 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2002 MHz 3600 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Shared memory 0