NVIDIA GeForce 840A vs ATI FirePro V7800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840A and ATI FirePro V7800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 700 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5596 vs 4894
- 34.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2188 vs 63
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 26 April 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5596 vs 4894 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2188 vs 63 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V7800
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 3.8x more pipelines: 1440 vs 384
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2,016.0 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2002 MHz
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2028 vs 1123
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 221
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3721 vs 2188
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1440 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,016.0 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2002 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2028 vs 1123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 vs 221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3721 vs 2188 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840A
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V7800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 840A | ATI FirePro V7800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1123 | 2028 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5596 | 4894 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2188 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2188 | 63 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2314 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2314 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3117 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3117 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.084 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1124.892 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.448 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.448 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.538 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 840A | ATI FirePro V7800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM108 | Cypress |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 26 April 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1009 | 1010 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $759 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2,016.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1440 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |