NVIDIA GeForce 840M vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 840M and AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2002 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1092 vs 336
- 7.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5738 vs 782
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 21 December 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 248.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1092 vs 336 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5738 vs 782 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 vs 150
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 vs 150 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1092 | 336 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 164 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5738 | 782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.594 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 840M | AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM108 | Caicos |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1273 | 1274 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 248.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 6.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity |