Intel HD Graphics 530 vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and NVIDIA GeForce 840M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 150
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 22.848
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 vs 162.594
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 1.237
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3191
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3191
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 12 March 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 150 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 vs 22.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 vs 162.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 vs 1.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3191 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1092 vs 996
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5743 vs 4379
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 vs 19.781
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 vs 30.177
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 vs 1045
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 vs 2393
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 vs 1045
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 vs 2393
- Around 31% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 503 vs 384
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1092 vs 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5743 vs 4379 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 vs 19.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 vs 30.177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 vs 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 vs 2393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 vs 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 vs 2393 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 vs 384 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 996 | 1092 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 150 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4379 | 5743 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | 22.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | 162.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | 1.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | 21.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | 95.545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3191 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 | 503 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 530 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | GM108 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 12 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1271 | 1273 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |