AMD Radeon R8 M365DX vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R8 M365DX and NVIDIA GeForce 840M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 199 vs 150
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 June 2015 vs 12 March 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 vs 150 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5748 vs 5601
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 vs 1229
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 vs 1229
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 vs 1370
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 vs 1370
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3191 vs 2017
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3191 vs 2017
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1093 vs 647
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5748 vs 5601 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 vs 1229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 vs 1229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 vs 1370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 vs 1370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 vs 2017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 vs 2017 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1093 vs 647 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | NVIDIA GeForce 840M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5601 | 5748 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1229 | 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1229 | 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1370 | 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1370 | 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2017 | 3191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2017 | 3191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 | 150 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 647 | 1093 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.594 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Meso | GM108 |
Launch date | 3 June 2015 | 12 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1272 | 1273 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 + 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |