AMD Radeon R8 M365DX vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R8 M365DX and NVIDIA GeForce 840M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 197 vs 149
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2015 vs 12 March 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 197 vs 149 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 vs 1229
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 vs 1229
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 vs 1370
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 vs 1370
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3191 vs 2017
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3191 vs 2017
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1088 vs 602
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5624 vs 5601 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 vs 1229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 vs 1229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 vs 1370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 vs 1370 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 vs 2017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 vs 2017 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1088 vs 602 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | NVIDIA GeForce 840M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5601 | 5624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1229 | 2085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1229 | 2085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1370 | 2736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1370 | 2736 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2017 | 3191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2017 | 3191 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 197 | 149 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 602 | 1088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.594 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Meso | GM108 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2015 | 12 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1266 | 1268 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 128 + 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R8 M365DX with others
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
ATIRadeon 9000
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260DX
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
IntelHD Graphics 530
AMDRadeon R8 M365DX vs
AMDRadeon Vega 3
