NVIDIA ION LE vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA ION LE and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA ION LE
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 105 Watt
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 96 vs 49
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2008 vs 29 October 2007 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 96 vs 49 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 463 vs 98
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 463 vs 98 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA ION LE
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA ION LE | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 98 | 463 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 96 | 49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA ION LE | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | ION | G92 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2008 | 29 October 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1397 | 1399 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 282 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 112 | |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCI | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
