NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 512 vs 499
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 512 vs 499
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2008 vs 4 October 2007 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 512 vs 499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 512 vs 499 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 459 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 228 vs 68
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 459 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 228 vs 68 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 68 | 228 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 47 | 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 512 | 499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 512 | 499 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Code name | MCP77MH MCP79MH | G86 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2008 | 4 October 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1667 | 1669 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Architecture | Tesla | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $37 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.22 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 459 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 8 | 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 29.376 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 3.67 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 21 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 210 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR2 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DMS-59 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
