NVIDIA GeForce G210M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G210M and NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G210M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 128 vs 68
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1294 vs 512
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1294 vs 512
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 June 2009 vs 3 June 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 128 vs 68 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1294 vs 512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1294 vs 512 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 47 vs 19
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 47 vs 19 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G210M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce G210M | NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 128 | 68 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 19 | 47 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2881 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1294 | 512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1294 | 512 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce G210M | NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | |
| Code name | GT218 | MCP77MH MCP79MH |
| Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 3 June 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1664 | 1667 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 450 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Floating-point performance | 48 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 72 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 260 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIVGA | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
