NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs ATI Radeon HD 3470
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS and ATI Radeon HD 3470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 4.4 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 122 vs 116
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 882 vs 764
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 882 vs 764
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 June 2008 vs 23 January 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 122 vs 116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 882 vs 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 882 vs 764 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3470
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 5x more pipelines: 40 vs 8
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 64 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 1900 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 58 vs 50
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Pipelines | 40 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 64 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 58 vs 50 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3470
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS | ATI Radeon HD 3470 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 122 | 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 50 | 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 882 | 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 882 | 764 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS | ATI Radeon HD 3470 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G98 | RV620 |
Launch date | 3 June 2008 | 23 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1632 | 1633 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 800 MHz |
CUDA cores | 8 | |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | 64 gflops |
Gigaflops | 31 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | 15.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |