NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and ATI Mobility Radeon X1300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2.7x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 8.9x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s
• 96x more pipelines: 384 vs 4
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
• 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
• 3.6x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 18.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 723 vs 40
• 17x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 197
• 17x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 197

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon X1300

• Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 222 vs 118

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X1300

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	723 40
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	118 222
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 197
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 197

Compare specifications (specs)