NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 1589
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 3235
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3339
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 1589
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 3235
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3339

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

• Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 15.68 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 798 vs 719
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 118
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3876 vs 3709
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.392 vs 8.358
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.864 vs 0.843
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.101 vs 15.374
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.77 vs 40.443
• Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 345 vs 326

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	719 798
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	118 149
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 3876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.358 9.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.606 157.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.843 0.864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.374 16.101
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.443 44.77
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	326 345

Compare specifications (specs)