NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 1589
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 3235
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3339
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 1589
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 3235
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3339
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 1 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 vs 157.479 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 vs 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 vs 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 vs 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 vs 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3339 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 15.68 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 796 vs 720
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 148 vs 118
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3882 vs 3704
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.392 vs 8.358
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.864 vs 0.843
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.101 vs 15.374
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.77 vs 40.443
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 345 vs 326
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 796 vs 720 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 148 vs 118 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3882 vs 3704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 vs 8.358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 vs 0.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 vs 15.374 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 vs 40.443 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 vs 326 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 720 | 796 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 118 | 148 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3704 | 3882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 | 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GK208B | GK107 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1310 | 1312 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,270 million |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1802 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder |