NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS and NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 400 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 100 vs 58
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 747 vs 328
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 747 vs 328
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 100 vs 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 747 vs 328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 747 vs 328 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 38 vs 26
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 vs 26 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS | NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 100 | 58 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 26 | 38 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 747 | 328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 747 | 328 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS | NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | |
Code name | G98 | MCP77MV MCP79MVL |
Launch date | 4 June 2008 | 3 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1679 | 1682 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 400 MHz |
CUDA cores | 8 | |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 34 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | |
Transistor count | 210 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-I | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |