NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS and NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS

  • Around 38% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 400 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
  • Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 100 vs 58
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 747 vs 328
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 747 vs 328
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 550 MHz vs 400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 80 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 100 vs 58
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 747 vs 328
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 747 vs 328

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G

  • Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 38 vs 26
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 38 vs 26

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
100
58
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
26
38
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
747
328
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
747
328
Name NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
PassMark - G3D Mark 100 58
PassMark - G2D Mark 26 38
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 747 328
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 747 328

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G

Essentials

Architecture Tesla
Code name G98 MCP77MV MCP79MVL
Launch date 4 June 2008 3 June 2008
Place in performance rating 1679 1682
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 550 MHz 400 MHz
CUDA cores 8
Floating-point performance 22.4 gflops
Gigaflops 34
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 80 nm
Pipelines 8 8
Texture fill rate 4.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt
Transistor count 210 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-I

API support

DirectX 10.0 10
OpenGL 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 11.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz
Memory type GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory 0 yes

Technologies

CUDA