NVIDIA GeForce 930MX vs NVIDIA GeForce G102M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and NVIDIA GeForce G102M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
• 4.5x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 7.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1293 vs 168
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 59
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 890
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 890

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G102M

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 952 MHz
• Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 17 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G102M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1293 168
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	195 59
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 890
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 890

Compare specifications (specs)