NVIDIA GeForce 940M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 915 MHz
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 980 MHz
• 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 300x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 vs 82.191
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3337
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3337

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

• 3.6x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 28.22 GTexel / s
• 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
• 2.7x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 903.2 gflops
• 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4413 vs 1127
• 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 468 vs 154
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15375 vs 5982
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.256 vs 25.98
• 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 168.449
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.037 vs 1.307
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 21.837
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3285 vs 2132
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3065
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3285 vs 2132
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3065
• 3.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1615 vs 506

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1127 4413
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	154 468
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5982 15375
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.98 36.256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	168.449 1029.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.307 3.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.837 45.894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	101.399 82.191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2132 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3065 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2132 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3065 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	506 1615

Compare specifications (specs)