NVIDIA GeForce 940M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce 940M und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 17% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1072 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Etwa 20% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1176 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 4.5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 33 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 300x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 vs 82.191
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3337
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3337
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 13 March 2015 vs 16 August 2012 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1072 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1176 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 vs 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3337 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- 3.6x mehr Texturfüllrate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 28.22 GTexel / s
- 3.5x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1344 vs 384
- 2.7x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,459.5 gflops vs 903.2 gflops
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4413 vs 1127
- 3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 468 vs 154
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15375 vs 5982
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.256 vs 25.98
- 6.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 168.449
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.037 vs 1.307
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 21.837
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3285 vs 2132
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3065
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3285 vs 2132
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3065
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1615 vs 506
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 28.22 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 1344 vs 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,459.5 gflops vs 903.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4413 vs 1127 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 468 vs 154 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15375 vs 5982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 vs 25.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 vs 168.449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 vs 1.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 vs 21.837 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 vs 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 3065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 vs 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 3065 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 vs 506 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 | 4413 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 | 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 | 15375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | 45.894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 | 1615 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Maxwell | Kepler |
Codename | GM108 | GK104 |
Startdatum | 13 March 2015 | 16 August 2012 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1184 | 701 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $299 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $321.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1176 MHz | 980 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1072 MHz | 915 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 903.2 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 1344 |
Texturfüllrate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA-Kerne | 1344 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Länge | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
SLI-Optionen | 3-way | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | Two 6-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 14.4 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Speichertyp | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |