NVIDIA GeForce 940M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 835 MHz
• Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 950 MHz
• Around 24% better floating-point performance: 903.2 gflops vs 729.6 gflops
• Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5982 vs 4062
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.98 vs 10.837
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.307 vs 1.098
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 vs 33.754
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 vs 1094
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 vs 2253
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3176
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 vs 1094
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 vs 2253
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3176
• Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 506 vs 475

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 30.4 billion / sec vs 28.22 GTexel / s
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1445 vs 1127
• Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 154
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 405.086 vs 168.449

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1127 1445
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	154 269
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5982 4062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.98 10.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	168.449 405.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.307 1.098
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.837 21.798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	101.399 33.754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2132 1094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3065 2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3176
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2132 1094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3065 2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3176
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	506 475

Compare specifications (specs)