NVIDIA GeForce 940M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 28% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1072 MHz versus 835 MHz
- Environ 24% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 950 MHz
- Environ 24% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 903.2 gflops versus 729.6 gflops
- Environ 52% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5982 versus 4062
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.98 versus 10.837
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.307 versus 1.098
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 versus 33.754
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 versus 1094
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 versus 2253
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3176
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 versus 1094
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 versus 2253
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3176
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 506 versus 475
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 22 March 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz versus 835 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 950 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops versus 729.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 versus 4062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 versus 10.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 versus 1.098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 versus 21.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 versus 33.754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 versus 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 versus 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 versus 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 versus 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3176 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 versus 475 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
- Environ 8% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 30.4 billion / sec versus 28.22 GTexel / s
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1445 versus 1127
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 versus 154
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 405.086 versus 168.449
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.4 billion / sec versus 28.22 GTexel / s |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1445 versus 1127 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 versus 154 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 405.086 versus 168.449 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 | 1445 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 | 269 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 | 4062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | 10.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | 405.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | 1.098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | 21.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | 33.754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 2253 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3176 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 | 475 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM108 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 22 March 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1184 | 1253 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | 950 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz | 835 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops | 729.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s | 30.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |