NVIDIA GeForce 945M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 945M and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 945M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8099 vs 6660
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.633 vs 18.437
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.988 vs 1.897
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.027 vs 23.742
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.094 vs 61.965
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3321
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3321

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

• Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• Around 30% better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2724 vs 2108
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 417 vs 255
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 427.88 vs 380.461
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 2961
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 2961

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2108 2724
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	255 417
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8099 6660
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.633 18.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	380.461 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.988 1.897
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.027 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	107.094 61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2961 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2961 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3343 3321

Compare specifications (specs)