NVIDIA GeForce 945M versus NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 945M and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 945M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 80 Watt
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8099 versus 6660
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.633 versus 18.437
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.988 versus 1.897
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.027 versus 23.742
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.094 versus 61.965
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3651
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 versus 3321
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3651
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 versus 3321
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2015 versus 1 March 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 80 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 versus 6660 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 versus 18.437 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 versus 1.897 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 versus 23.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 versus 61.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3321 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Environ 74% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 51.84 GTexel / s versus 29.81 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 512
- Environ 30% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,244 gflops versus 953.9 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5616 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2724 versus 2106
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 417 versus 243
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 427.88 versus 380.461
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 versus 2961
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 versus 2961
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.84 GTexel / s versus 29.81 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,244 gflops versus 953.9 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5616 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2724 versus 2106 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 417 versus 243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 versus 380.461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 versus 2961 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 versus 2961 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 945M | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2106 | 2724 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 243 | 417 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8099 | 6660 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.633 | 18.437 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 380.461 | 427.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.988 | 1.897 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.027 | 23.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.094 | 61.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2961 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2961 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3321 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 945M | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 27 October 2015 | 1 March 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 961 | 889 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
| Prix maintenant | $225.65 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | 1,244 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | 51.84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | 134.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 5616 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 945M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M360
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 945M vs
AMDRadeon 680M
