NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT vs ATI Radeon HD 4870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT and ATI Radeon HD 4870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 81 vs 44
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 vs 25 June 2008 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 vs 44 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4870
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 30 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- 8.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 96
- 5x better floating-point performance: 1,200.0 gflops vs 240 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1380 vs 381
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3237
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3237
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 800 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops vs 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1380 vs 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3237 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | ATI Radeon HD 4870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 | 1380 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 | 44 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3237 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3237 | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | ATI Radeon HD 4870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G92 | RV770 |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 | 25 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1329 | 1330 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 750 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | 30 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 250 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PureVideo HD |