NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 78 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 381 vs 372
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 vs 8 January 2008 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 78 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 vs 372 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 112 vs 96
- Around 17% better floating-point performance: 280 gflops vs 240 gflops
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3285 vs 3237
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3285 vs 3237
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 112 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 280 gflops vs 240 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3285 vs 3237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3285 vs 3237 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 | 372 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 | 81 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3237 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3237 | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G92 |
Launch date | 29 July 2008 | 8 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1325 | 1327 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Price now | $99.02 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.26 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | 280 gflops |
Gigaflops | 360 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 78 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PureVideo HD |