NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- Around 86% better floating-point performance: 43.2 gflops vs 23.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 35 vs 28
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 866 vs 784
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 866 vs 784
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 May 2009 vs 15 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 43.2 gflops vs 23.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 35 vs 28 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 866 vs 784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 866 vs 784 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 580 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 4.64 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 31 Watt
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1008 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 136 vs 113
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 580 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4.64 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 31 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 136 vs 113 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 35 | 28 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 113 | 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2451 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 866 | 784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 866 | 784 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96C | G98 |
Launch date | 26 May 2009 | 15 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1672 | 1673 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 580 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 43.2 gflops | 23.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 4.64 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-I |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8.06 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1008 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |