NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 and ATI Radeon HD 3850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 668 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 10.69 GTexel / s
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 58 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 44 vs 29
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 January 2010 vs 19 November 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1360 MHz vs 668 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 10.69 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 vs 29 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- 3x better floating-point performance: 427.5 gflops vs 144 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1660 MHz vs 790 MHz
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 401 vs 220
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 1686
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 1686
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 427.5 gflops vs 144 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1660 MHz vs 790 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 401 vs 220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 vs 1686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 vs 1686 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 220 | 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 | 29 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5892 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1686 | 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1686 | 3345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G94 | RV670 |
Launch date | 26 January 2010 | 19 November 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | $179 |
Place in performance rating | 1583 | 1463 |
Price now | $79.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1360 MHz | 668 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 144 gflops | 427.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 48 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 10.69 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | 208 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.3 GB / s | 53.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 790 MHz | 1660 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |