NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 and NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2x more texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 8.8 billion / sec
- 3x more pipelines: 96 vs 32
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 257.28 gflops vs 89.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 512 MB or 1 GB vs 256 / 512 MB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 501 vs 172
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 46 vs 32
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2009 vs 29 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 8.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 96 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops vs 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB or 1 GB vs 256 / 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 501 vs 172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 vs 32 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 69 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1505 vs 1385
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1505 vs 1385
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 69 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1505 vs 1385 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1505 vs 1385 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 501 | 172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 46 | 32 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9236 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1979 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1979 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1385 | 1505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1385 | 1505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.838 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT215 | G96C |
Launch date | 17 November 2009 | 29 July 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | $85.99 |
Place in performance rating | 1394 | 1666 |
Price now | $37.99 | $85.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.27 | 4.13 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1340 MHz | 1400 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops | 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105C C | 105 °C |
Pipelines | 96 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 8.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S / PDIF |
Display Connectors | DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm) | 6.875" (17.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.2 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB or 1 GB | 256 / 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB / s | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |