NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
2.3x more pipelines: 72 vs 32
2.5x better floating-point performance: 187.49 gflops vs 73.6 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 1400 MHz
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 461 vs 208
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2502 vs 1857
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2502 vs 1857

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 February 2010 vs 9 June 2007
Texture fill rate	12.96 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	72 vs 32
Floating-point performance	187.49 gflops vs 73.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 80 nm
Maximum memory size	1 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed	1580 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	461 vs 208
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2502 vs 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2502 vs 1857

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

Around 6% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 540 MHz
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 43 Watt
Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 84 vs 62

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	575 MHz vs 540 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt vs 43 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	84 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

461

208

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2502

1857

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2502

1857

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
PassMark - G2D Mark	62	84
PassMark - G3D Mark	461	208
Geekbench - OpenCL	8132
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2502	1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2502	1857

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Essentials
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Tesla
Code name	GT215	G84
Launch date	2 February 2010	9 June 2007
Place in performance rating	1477	1480
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	540 MHz	575 MHz
Floating-point performance	187.49 gflops	73.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	80 nm
Pipelines	72	32
Texture fill rate	12.96 GTexel / s	9.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	43 Watt	20 Watt
Transistor count	727 million	289 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-HE
Length	175 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	10.1	10.0
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	25.28 GB / s	22.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1580 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR3, GDDR2
Shared memory		no
Technologies
Gigathread technology
HDCP-capable
PCI-E 16x
PowerMizer 7.0