NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 72 vs 32
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 187.49 gflops vs 73.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 461 vs 208
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2502 vs 1857
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2502 vs 1857
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 vs 9 June 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 72 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 187.49 gflops vs 73.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 461 vs 208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2502 vs 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2502 vs 1857 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 43 Watt
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 84 vs 62
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 43 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 84 vs 62 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 62 | 84 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 461 | 208 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8132 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2502 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2502 | 1857 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT215 | G84 |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 | 9 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1479 | 1482 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 540 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 187.49 gflops | 73.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s | 9.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Length | 175 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.28 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3, GDDR2 |
Shared memory | no | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |