NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
• Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3307 vs 2112
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1458 vs 1247
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1458 vs 1247
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1774 vs 1679
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1774 vs 1679

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470

• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 3.3x more pipelines: 80 vs 24
• Around 50% better floating-point performance: 120 gflops vs 80 gflops
• 2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1580 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 236 vs 107
• 11x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 33

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	107 236
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	33 362
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3307 2112
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1458 1247
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1458 1247
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1774 1679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1774 1679

Compare specifications (specs)