NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 192 gflops vs 80 gflops
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 397 vs 106
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 89 vs 35
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 vs 1458
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2906 vs 1774
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 vs 1458
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2906 vs 1774
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 3 March 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 397 vs 106 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 89 vs 35 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 vs 1458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2906 vs 1774 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 vs 1458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 vs 1774 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 6.0 billion / sec
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 23 Watt
- Around 98% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3307 vs 1583
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s vs 6.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 23 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3307 vs 1583 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 397 | 106 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 89 | 35 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1583 | 3307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.329 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.162 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.426 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 737 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 | 1458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2906 | 1774 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 737 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 | 1458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 | 1774 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF108 | GT216 |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 3 March 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1509 | 1510 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 6.0 billion / sec | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1580 MHz |
Memory type | (G)DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |