NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • 2x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
  • 2.4x better floating-point performance: 192 gflops vs 80 gflops
  • 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 397 vs 106
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 89 vs 35
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 vs 1458
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2906 vs 1774
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 vs 1458
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2906 vs 1774
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 September 2010 vs 3 March 2010
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
Pipelines 96 vs 24
Floating-point performance 192 gflops vs 80 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 397 vs 106
PassMark - G2D Mark 89 vs 35
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1731 vs 1458
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2906 vs 1774
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1731 vs 1458
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2906 vs 1774

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

  • Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 6.0 billion / sec
  • Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 23 Watt
  • Around 98% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3307 vs 1583
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 8 GTexel / s vs 6.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 14 Watt vs 23 Watt
Memory clock speed 1580 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 3307 vs 1583

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
397
106
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
89
35
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1583
3307
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1731
1458
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2906
1774
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1731
1458
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2906
1774
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
PassMark - G3D Mark 397 106
PassMark - G2D Mark 89 35
Geekbench - OpenCL 1583 3307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 162.162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.426
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 12.306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 737
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1731 1458
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2906 1774
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 737
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1731 1458
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2906 1774

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi Tesla 2.0
Code name GF108 GT216
Launch date 3 September 2010 3 March 2010
Place in performance rating 1509 1510
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 1000 MHz 500 MHz
CUDA cores 96
Floating-point performance 192 gflops 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 24
Texture fill rate 6.0 billion / sec 8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 23 Watt 14 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 486 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 API 10.1
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 800 MHz 1580 MHz
Memory type (G)DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
PCI-E 2.0