NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs NVIDIA GeForce G105M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M and NVIDIA GeForce G105M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 5.12 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 24 vs 8
• 3.1x better floating-point performance: 80 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 3.2x more memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 700 (GDDR3) MHz
• Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 107 vs 63
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 33 vs 22
• Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3307 vs 2534
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1774 vs 1314
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1774 vs 1314

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce G105M

• 3.2x more core clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce G105M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	107 63
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	33 22
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3307 2534
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1774 1314
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1774 1314

Compare specifications (specs)