NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M vs ATI Radeon X1650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M and ATI Radeon X1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

ATI Radeon X1650

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
2.2x more core clock speed: 1080 MHz vs 500 MHz
5.4x more texture fill rate: 10.8 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2120 vs 1615
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2120 vs 1615

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 January 2010 vs 1 February 2007
Core clock speed	1080 MHz vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate	10.8 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 90 nm
Maximum memory size	1 GB vs 256 MB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2120 vs 1615
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2120 vs 1615

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1650

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2120

1615

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2120

1615

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M	ATI Radeon X1650
PassMark - G3D Mark	382
PassMark - G2D Mark	32
Geekbench - OpenCL	7386
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2120	1615
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2120	1615

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M	ATI Radeon X1650
Essentials
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	R500
Code name	GT215	RV530
Launch date	7 January 2010	1 February 2007
Place in performance rating	1566	1569
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	1080 MHz	500 MHz
CUDA cores	72
Floating-point performance	155.52 gflops
Gigaflops	233
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	90 nm
Pipelines	72
Texture fill rate	10.8 GTexel / s	2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	28 Watt
Transistor count	727 million	157 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	10.1	9.0c
OpenGL	2.1	2.0
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB / s	12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory type	DDR3, GDDR3	DDR2
Shared memory	0
Memory clock speed		800 MHz
Technologies
CUDA
HybridPower
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
PowerMizer 8.0
SLI