NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5450
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 5450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 134.4 gflops vs 104 gflops
- Around 2% higher maximum memory size: 1048 MB vs 1 GB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 426 vs 136
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 vs 140
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 660 vs 344
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1158 vs 666
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1626 vs 1457
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 660 vs 344
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1158 vs 666
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1626 vs 1457
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 4 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 134.4 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1048 MB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 426 vs 136 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 vs 140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 660 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1158 vs 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1626 vs 1457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 660 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1158 vs 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1626 vs 1457 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5450
- Around 86% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 80 vs 48
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2572 vs 1161
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 10.124 vs 8.55
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 80 vs 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 vs 1161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.124 vs 8.55 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 426 | 136 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 140 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1161 | 2572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.005 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.55 | 10.124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 660 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1158 | 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1626 | 1457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 660 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1158 | 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1626 | 1457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.16 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF108 | Cedar |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 4 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1526 | 1606 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 134.4 gflops | 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 2.8 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 292 million |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1048 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |