NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 96 vs 32
- 2x better floating-point performance: 192 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 800 (GDDR3) MHz
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 397 vs 146
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 88 vs 30
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2906 vs 2744
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2906 vs 2744
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 96 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 500 (DDR2) / 800 (GDDR3) MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 397 vs 146 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 88 vs 30 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2906 vs 2744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 vs 2744 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 9.6 GTexel / s vs 6.0 billion / sec
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 9.6 GTexel / s vs 6.0 billion / sec |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 397 | 146 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 88 | 30 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1583 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.329 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.162 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.426 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 737 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2906 | 2744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 737 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 | 2744 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF108 | G96 |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 8 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1518 | 1519 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | 32 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 6.0 billion / sec | 9.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 314 million |
Gigaflops | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Single Link DVIDisplayPortVGAHDMIDual Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 16 (DDR2) / 25 (GDDR3) |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 500 (DDR2) / 800 (GDDR3) MHz |
Memory type | (G)DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 | ||
Power management | 8.0 |