NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 4x more texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- 2x better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 134.4 gflops
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 603 vs 426
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 189
- Around 91% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2223 vs 1161
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.396 vs 3.121
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 vs 660
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1713 vs 1158
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 vs 660
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1713 vs 1158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 October 2010 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 134.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 603 vs 426 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 vs 189 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2223 vs 1161 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.396 vs 3.121 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 vs 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1713 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 vs 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 vs 1158 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
- Around 2% higher maximum memory size: 1048 MB vs 1 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 109.787 vs 87.094
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 8.55 vs 3.764
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 1048 MB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.787 vs 87.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.55 vs 3.764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1626 vs 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1626 vs 1624 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 603 | 426 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 189 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2223 | 1161 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.396 | 3.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 87.094 | 109.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.005 | 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.764 | 8.55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1713 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1624 | 1626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1624 | 1626 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | GF108 | GF108 |
| Launch date | 11 October 2010 | 3 September 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1505 | 1526 |
| Price now | $35.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 20.89 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 700 MHz |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 134.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec | 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 145 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1048 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 610i
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 3000M
